Federal authorities charge illegal immigrant with voting in New Jersey midterm election

 July 1, 2026, NEWS

Federal prosecutors have arrested and charged a 62-year-old Slovak national with illegally casting a ballot in a federal election in New Jersey, the latest in a string of non-citizen voting cases the Justice Department has pursued in the state this year.

Marian Charitun faces two counts: voting by an alien in a federal election, which carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison, and unlawful procurement of citizenship or naturalization, which carries up to 10 years. The case was brought by the United States Attorney's Office's Election Integrity Task Force, the Daily Caller first reported.

The charges paint a straightforward picture. Charitun allegedly registered to vote in New Jersey and falsely claimed to be a U.S. citizen when doing so. He then voted in the 2022 midterm elections. Later, when he applied for American citizenship, he allegedly told federal officials he had never voted in a federal election. The lie didn't hold. An official familiar with the case told the Daily Caller that Charitun's voting history was discovered during the citizenship application process, and his application was denied.

A pattern in New Jersey

Charitun's arrest is not an isolated case. It follows a cluster of similar prosecutions in the same state.

In May, the Justice Department charged four green card holders in New Jersey with illegally voting in federal elections, including the 2020 presidential race, the 2022 midterms, and the 2024 presidential election, and then lying about it on their naturalization applications. Those defendants were nationals of Liberia, Jamaica, Israel, and India. Each falsely attested to being U.S. citizens on voter registration forms. Each later claimed on citizenship paperwork that they had never voted. The charges in those cases carry penalties of up to 16 years in prison.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche framed the enforcement push in blunt terms when those May charges were announced.

"This administration will not tolerate aliens who attempt to vote in our elections when they know they are not eligible."

FBI Director Kash Patel was equally direct.

"Noncitizens voting is a federal crime, period, and while other administrations may have looked the other way in the past, those days are over."

Those aren't throwaway lines. They signal a deliberate shift in enforcement posture, one that treats non-citizen voting not as a bureaucratic footnote but as a prosecutable offense worth the Justice Department's time and resources.

How non-citizens end up on the rolls

A separate New Jersey case sheds light on how these situations develop. A French national named Eliezer Kadoch pleaded guilty to voting illegally in the same November 2022 federal midterm elections. His defense? He said New Jersey automatically registered him to vote when he obtained his driver's license, and he believed he was legally permitted to cast a ballot.

His attorney, Yosef Jacobovitch, told Fox News:

"There was never any intent to violate the law or cast an unlawful ballot. Unfortunately, the offense to which he pleaded guilty does not require proof of criminal intent, and he now fully understands that."

That case exposed a systemic vulnerability that extends well beyond New Jersey. Multiple states, including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Texas, and Virginia, have identified non-citizens on their voter rolls, often because automatic voter registration systems tied to driver's licenses fail to screen out people who aren't eligible. The system registers them. Nobody checks. And some of them vote.

Whether a given non-citizen voter acted out of confusion or deliberate fraud, the result is the same: an illegal ballot counted alongside lawful ones. The Kadoch case makes the mechanical problem visible. The Charitun case, where the defendant allegedly lied about his citizenship on the registration form and then lied again on his naturalization application, suggests something harder to wave away as a misunderstanding.

The legislative stalemate

These prosecutions arrive against the backdrop of a stalled legislative effort to tighten the front end of the process. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, known as the SAVE America Act, would require proof of American citizenship to register to vote and photo identification to cast a ballot in federal elections. The bill, designated H.R. 7296 in the 119th Congress, has gone nowhere.

House Speaker Mike Johnson told Fox News on Sunday that Republicans plan to try a new path forward. He said the House could attach the SAVE America Act to a reconciliation bill, bypassing the 60-vote Senate threshold that has kept it bottled up.

"This time we're going to try to put it on a reconciliation bill, and the reason that's so important, Maria, as you know, is it prevents the necessity of 60 votes in the Senate. The Democrats want no part of this, and remember, this is very basic stuff."

Johnson continued:

"We're just going to make sure you have to have proof of citizenship to register to vote and then show an ID when you turn out at the ballot box. These are 90-10 public opinion issues, and more than 70 percent of Democrats want to do it, but not the Democrats in the House and Senate, and so we've got to go around them."

The Speaker's framing is pointed: he says the public overwhelmingly supports citizenship verification and voter ID, but Democratic lawmakers refuse to act. Whether reconciliation is the right vehicle for election law, a question that will provoke procedural objections, is secondary to the political reality Johnson is describing. The current system has no federal requirement that voters prove citizenship before registering. States that have tried to add such requirements on their own have faced legal challenges. And the cases keep coming.

Enforcement versus prevention

The gap between what the law allows on the back end and what it prevents on the front end is the core problem. Right now, the system relies on the honor system at registration and criminal prosecution after the fact. Charitun's case illustrates both halves. He allegedly checked a box claiming citizenship. Nobody stopped him. He voted. It was only when he applied for naturalization, a separate federal process with its own paperwork and background checks, that anyone caught the discrepancy.

That means the 2022 election in which he voted already happened. The ballot was already counted. No after-the-fact prosecution undoes that.

Some researchers have concluded that non-citizen voting in federal elections is rare. Others have found that even low-frequency illegal voting can affect the outcomes of close races. The Daily Caller noted both lines of research without citing specific figures. But rarity is cold comfort in a system that depends on public trust. Every verified case of a non-citizen casting a ballot, whether one or one hundred, erodes confidence that the rolls are clean and the count is honest.

New Jersey, with its automatic voter registration system and its growing list of prosecutions, has become a case study in what happens when convenience is prioritized over verification. The state makes it easy to register. It does not make it hard enough for ineligible people to slip through.

What remains unanswered

Several details about the Charitun case remain unclear. The specific New Jersey municipality where he registered and voted has not been disclosed. The exact date of his arrest and the federal district handling the case have not been publicly identified. The conditions of any bail or detention are unknown. And it remains unclear whether his case is connected to the four green card holders charged in May or whether the Election Integrity Task Force is pursuing these matters independently.

What is clear is the trajectory. The Justice Department is prosecuting non-citizen voting cases in New Jersey at a pace that would have been difficult to imagine a few years ago. Five defendants charged in two months, all in the same state, all following the same pattern: register illegally, vote illegally, then lie about it on citizenship paperwork.

The question for Congress is whether it will keep leaving the front door unlocked and relying on prosecutors to clean up afterward, or whether it will finally require proof of citizenship before a ballot is issued. The cases are making the argument that the current system can't.

About Aiden Sutton

Aiden is a conservative political writer with years of experience covering U.S. politics and national affairs. Topics include elections, institutions, culture, and foreign policy. His work prioritizes accountability over ideology.
Copyright © 2026 - CapitalismInstitute.org
A Project of Connell Media.
magnifier